Soft engineering’ plans are not suitable for the coastal path from west Emsworth into Nore Barn Woods
Natural
England (NE) are still working on the national King Charles
III coast path including the section west of Emsworth.
One stretch awaiting finalised plans runs between the
sea end of Warblington Road and into Nore Barn Woods.
Hundreds of local people use this stretch regularly
but several times a year high tides mean many turn back
rather than paddle or wade along the flooded path.
The nearby bridge into Nore Barn Woods also floods
regularly.
NE has come up with various designs since 2019 to address
the flooding problem, but their latest plans show a new
boardwalk extending the path from Warblington Road, plus
strengthening and lifting the nearby bridge over the Nore
stream. The path approaching this bridge, from both sides,
is planned with a raised hoggin surface plus 40 gabions
supporting handrails alongside.
Boardwalks are a type of ‘soft engineering’. They are not
permanent and will gradually be eroded.
Is this the best way to deal with this path,
especially the part with houses behind? Why not extend (by
25 meters) the existing 1960’s concrete raised path that
currently runs westward along the foot of the seawall from
the end of Warblington Road?
Is it because that would be ‘hard engineering’?
Why is that considered unsuitable here?
NE should note that the existing raised concrete path works
and additionally protects the seawall behind. But any
boardwalk section added would eventually be eroded, be
unattractive in the meantime and make access from the sea
difficult for swimmers and sailors as well as making any
repair needed on the seawall virtually impossible. Should
Natural England go back to the drawing board for this
stretch?
For the latest plans from NE see
http://maisemoregardens.co.uk/England%20Coast%20Path.html
Maggie Gebbett April 2024
Publidhed in the EMS Spring 2024